When Nancy Meets Ted

Posted on July 26th, 2007 in Nancy Meets Ted by kimber

“Hi.” A word tossed over broad shoulders, casually as though it meant nothing. Nancy watched, dry mouthed, while Ted Sherbourne settled his long legs around the seat in front of them.

“Ah,” was all she could manage, well after the fact. Ted talked to her. Her.

Unless, her gaze slid to her neighbor, he had been addressing Stanley. No, she decided, life couldn’t be that cruel.

“Ah?” her pink haired friend, victim of a botched dye job, repeated, “you’ve been waiting months to talk to him and that’s that the best you can do, Nance No Chance? Say something to your hunky hunk.”

Something, that sounded so easy. “But what?” she whispered, at a loss.

Stanley rolled his eyes, picking up her pen, twirling it. Then before Nancy realized what he was planning, he threw it forward. “I have a brilliant idea. Why don’t you ask for your pen back?”

“I have a brilliant idea…” she was about to tell him off when Ted turned. Oh, lord, he was going to talk to her again. Nancy slumped down in her seat.

“Is this yours?” Yep, he was talking to her.

She opened her mouth and “ah” came out again. Stanley, that rat, snickered. “Yes.” She forced. Better.

“It’s a nice pen.” Ted stroked the plastic shell, sliding it back and forth in his hand. “Red, like your hair.”

A pause. This was where she was supposed to talk. Nothing. She had nothing.

His blue eyes twinkled. “Would you like it back?”

“Yes.” She breathed. Though if he wanted to keep it…

“A girl who only says yes,” his voice was deeper than she expected from his lanky frame, “a dream of mine.”

Nancy blushed. She wouldn’t be discussing any dreams of hers.

“Let me test this.” He leaned forward until she could smell him, turf and grease. “This is my last class of the day, Nancy.” He knew her name. Ted Sherbourne knew her name. “Would you like to go to a movie after?”

Nancy smiled, so lightheaded she would have passed out, if not for Stanley viscously pinching her outer thigh. “Yes.”

To Continue

$
Read more about a much older Nancy, Anne’s business partner, in Breach Of Trust, available May 2008.

Elements Of A Proposal For Venture Capital

Posted on July 22nd, 2007 in Venture Capital by kimber

What Venture Capitalists look for is basically a business plan, tweaked for their purpose (funding).

According to the U.S. Small Business Administration, these are the core components;

Purpose and Objectives

An executive summary of the project with a why funding should be allocated.

Proposed Financing

How much you need throughout the life of the project, where the financing is coming from (debt/equity), how the money will be spent and some solid thinking behind the dollars quoted.

Marketing

Your targeted market segment, its characteristics (including key industry figures), competitive analysis, and how you plan to obtain the market share you’re targeting (with costs)

History of the Firm

Significant milestones (financial and organizational), employee relations, banking arrangements, major services and products offered, awards won, legal issues, etc.

Description of the Product or Service

A description of the product, what it costs, patents involved, key competitive advantage, etc.

Financial Statements

Core statements (balance sheets, income statement, and statement of cash flows) looking both forwards (pro forma) for the next 3-5 years and backwards (the life of the company).
Statements should assume financing is obtained.

Capitalization

A list of shareholders, dollars involved, and in what form (equity/debt).
Clearly outline any associations.

Biographical Sketches

Bios including employment histories and qualifications for key stakeholders

Principal Suppliers and Customers

Outline any suppliers or customers holding a significant percent (I usually use 10% plus) of revenue or costs, include details of any longer term (one year plus) contracts.

Problems Anticipated and Other Pertinent Information

Any lawsuits, labor issues, patent or tax difficulties.

Advantages

What advantages do your project/company hold over others?

What makes your proposal special?

This is the bare minimum required by most venture capitalists.

Female Entrepreneurs And Venture Capital

Posted on July 15th, 2007 in Venture Capital by kimber

“If you are a woman building a company in Silicon Valley, you are statistically more likely to be hit by a venture capitalist than funded by one.”
Linda Hahner, president of San Francisco based Out of the Blue Design.

In 2006, 30% of all businesses were owned by women, female owned business the fastest growing economic trend, yet between 5 to 7% of venture capital is allocated to these businesses. 73% of female founded companies’ growth capital is instead sourced from individuals.

Why?

According to Carol Sands (at the time of the interview, a managing member of a group of professional angel investors), “The real reason why women lag behind men in attracting venture capital dollars is that fewer women actually ask.”

Why don’t we ask, especially since we are more likely than our male counterparts to seek professional advice?

Talking informally to some of my female entrepreneurial buddies, one of the reasons is a lack of understanding about the process. Venture Capital Funding is a mysterious black box right from where to find a venture capital firm (antiventurecapital.com ironically has a great listing ) to the exit strategies venture capital firms normally use.

Fortunately there are some organizations to assist with the funding process. Springboard Enterprises ( http://www.springboardenterprises.org/ ) is a non-profit organization connecting female entrepreneurs with equity capital.

What Venture Capitalists Look For

Posted on July 8th, 2007 in Venture Capital by kimber

Entrepreneur Magazine recently interviewed three venture capital firms about what they looked for in a company. 

Ilya Nykin, Prolog managing director:

Nykin was not shy about calling their criteria for funding “stringent.”  ”We were looking for the most breakthrough opportunities that address large unmet needs, that can be brought to market in a reasonable time and for a reasonable investment, and that have some scientific validity.”

Prolog also has a clear idea of the type of leader they prefer.  The entrepreneur should have “experience, energy, foresight, drive and vision.” 

Andrew Lindner, Frontier managing partner:

Securing funding with Frontier is a slow process.  “Our model is to track a company for a while”.  Like most venture capital firms, they also have a tight stage and sector focus.  ”We are a growth-capital provider focused on highly differentiated service businesses in the Southeast and Mid-Atlantic.”

Adrian Smith, Ignition partner:

Smith again stresses a rigorous funding process.  ”It involves the portfolio mix we want to have at Ignition, and [the company] has to meet the business criteria we’re looking for.”  What made them happy about this particular company?  We “were very comfortable that we had a great team going after a large market. We were also able to agree on terms. There’s a lot to negotiate: the amount being raised, options and vesting of those options, liquidation preferences.”

Note the words associated with funding…stringent, rigorous.

Also important is the tight focus of the firms.  Why such a narrow scope? 

Because venture capitalists are active partners.  They believe in the companies they back.  They are involved, often requiring monthly meetings.  They want to contribute more than purely capital.  To do that, they need experience in the industry.